<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Post Internet &#187; lecture</title>
	<atom:link href="http://122909a.com.rhizome.org/?feed=rss2&#038;tag=lecture" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://122909a.com.rhizome.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2019 11:37:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title></title>
		<link>https://122909a.com.rhizome.org/?p=105</link>
		<comments>https://122909a.com.rhizome.org/?p=105#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 01:32:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[paulslocum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[death]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dr. who]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dr. who and cops with house music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[endlessness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[event]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[light industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paul slocum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[re-generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time lord]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time travel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://122909a.com.rhizome.org/?p=105</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At Light Industry in Brooklyn, the artist Paul Slocum recently exhibited a re-constructed 1966 Dr. Who episode which long-time fans of the series feared was “lost in time” following a spat of sweeping reductions from the BBC’s entire television archive during the 1960s and 70s.
The BBC’s discarding of this particular Dr. Who episode was not [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At Light Industry in Brooklyn, the artist Paul Slocum recently exhibited a re-constructed 1966 <em>Dr. Who </em>episode which long-time fans of the series feared was “lost in time” following a spat of sweeping reductions from the BBC’s entire television archive during the 1960s and 70s.</p>
<p>The BBC’s discarding of this particular <em>Dr. Who </em>episode was not personal, but economic – they were looking for a way to save money on media storage.</p>
<p>In the current epoch of media storage technology, though, the data cloud affords ample room to archive and database this or any other <em>Dr. Who </em>episode.</p>
<p>And, indeed, in response to this hunger, fans of the show and, eventually, the BBC itself have subsequently played the role of the “time-lord,” travelling back in time and re-constructing several of these lost episodes.</p>
<p>As one views-through this particular episode re-construction, which was conducted by the BBC, one listens to an original audio track and views two key visual elements:</p>
<p>1. The first is the rough-hewn re-construction of the episode itself which consists of explanatory text as well as black-and-white production stills and video footage scraps depicting low-budget sci-fi sets and costumes intermingling with actors frozen in time.</p>
<p>There’s a surrealistic, dreamy quality to the visual rhythm here and the lack of clear connection between the images on the screen to the soundtrack reminds one of, say, the Chris Marker film <em>La Jetée </em>which is, likewise, a time-travel story told through an audio track and a series of black-and-white still frames.</p>
<p>2. The second key visual element in the re-construction, though, is the shifting background of solid colors intermingling with random number and letter strings under which this episode re-construction plays-through.</p>
<p>This shifting background imagery reads as “tech” or “sci-fi future” or “futurity”; however, it does so in a notably different way than those same words would find their meaning in the imagery of the episode re-construction – (they read here – not as better or worse – but simply as if from a different era – perhaps the mid-1990s [there’s something <em>Gattaca </em>about the background’s look] – in any event, equally historically dated – dead).</p>
<p>At the end of the episode’s narrative, the Doctor (one vision of the future) “dies” and is – then – re-generated into an entirely new Doctor (another vision of the future) with an entirely new take on the role of the “time lord” who will, nevertheless – play-out an old story:</p>
<p>Like the Doctor before him – this new Doctor will die and be re-generated and, then, <em>that </em>Doctor will die and be re-generated and so on and so on and so on and so on.</p>
<p>Slocum’s further re-contextualization of the episode re-construction itself provides an even deeper layer of re-generation:</p>
<p>One views here neither the obsolete imagery of the episode re-construction nor the obsolete imagery of the background of the re-construction nor the collision of the re-construction and its background, but rather an endless chain of dead re-generations of the future extending forever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://122909a.com.rhizome.org/?feed=rss2&amp;p=105</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
