<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Post Internet &#187; ed halter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://122909a.com.rhizome.org/?feed=rss2&#038;tag=ed-halter" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://122909a.com.rhizome.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2019 11:37:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title></title>
		<link>https://122909a.com.rhizome.org/?p=188</link>
		<comments>https://122909a.com.rhizome.org/?p=188#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 03:02:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dennisknopf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amateurism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ed halter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guthrie lonergan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sub amateur]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://122909a.com.rhizome.org/?p=188</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Whereas once there were amateur photographers – hobbyists whose interest in the camera’s aesthetics led them to a love of privately displaying their pre-digital photographs – there are now what Ed Halter, in his essay “After the Amateur: Notes,” calls “sub-amateurs” – users whose interest in the camera’s functionality in communication led them to a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whereas once there were amateur photographers – hobbyists whose interest in the camera’s aesthetics led them to a love of privately displaying their pre-digital photographs – there are now what Ed Halter, in his essay “After the Amateur: Notes,” calls “sub-amateurs” – <em>users</em> whose interest in the camera’s functionality in communication led them to a need for publicly displaying their digital photographs.</p>
<p>Think: family album versus Facebook.</p>
<p>The same could be said for the world of amateur filmmaking (pre-camcorder) in relation to the world of YouTube.</p>
<p>The amateur filmmaker often embraced her 8mm or 16mm film camera out of a sincere interest in the technology; the sub-amateur YouTube user often embraces the functionality of the webcam out of a sincere interest in communication.</p>
<p>Halter writes:</p>
<blockquote><p>The amateur enjoyed spending time with the camera, and thus could become caught up in its formal possibilities; the sub-amateur sees the camera in terms of pure and immediate functionality.</p>
<p>*****</p></blockquote>
<p>A vein of contemporary Internet art has, according to Halter, emerged in accordance with the rise of sub-amateurism on the Internet.</p>
<p>He points to artists such as Guthrie Lonergan, Oliver Laric, Double Happiness, and Petra Cortright who conduct investigations into the functions of sub-amateur web usage in order to unveil these functions <em>as </em>functions rather than formal qualities.</p>
<p>They illuminate the function of the software default rather than a particular form so that we, the viewers of their artwork, may better see these default functions as conventions in the way we speak to one another in 2010.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://122909a.com.rhizome.org/?feed=rss2&amp;p=188</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
